Following
the success of HMA No. 9, further ships were ordered by the
Admiralty. Along with the Vickers Company, three new contractors
were required to produce rigid ships. The Vickers Company had
already proven themselves with the design and construction of
No. 9 and were the only company with any experience of building
a large ship.
Statistics:
Length
535ft
Diameter
53ft
Speed
52mph
Engines
4 x
250hp
Volume
942,
000cft
Following
the trials and design success of HMA No. 9, it was agreed that
the Zeppelin threat had to be tackled head on; the Admiralty required
more ships. There were initial problems at the Admiralty with
regards to change of staff and also general opinion regarding
rigid airships, as the successful non-rigid programme was expanding
rapidly. However in June of 1915, along with the Vickers Company,
three new contractors were selected to produce rigid ships.
The
three new contractors were Beardmore, Armstrong and Whitworth
and finally Shorts Brothers. All three companies were to become
famous in the world of aviation. By October 1915 the drawings
were approved and three ships were ordered. By December the pace
of design and the requirement for big ships had increased dramatically
and a further sixteen ships had been budgeted for by the Admiralty.
All of these ships were to become known as the 23 Class, which
were in effect stretched versions of the original No. 9. The designs
were seen in essence as modified versions of No.9, with an extra
bay inserted in the middle of the ship. A gun platform was added
to the top of the ship designed to take a two pound gun and two
Lewis machine guns. The platform was surrounded by 18 inch sanctions
carrying lifelines. These sanctions could be extended to double
the height in order to carry a canvas windscreen. Three other
Lewis guns were to be fitted at the extreme tail, in the control
car further aft and on the top walking way.
The bomb load was to be greater than that of HMA 9 but none was
actually specified. The ships each possessed an external keel,
to the same pattern as the No. 9. The cabin being 45 feet long
contain crew accommodation, a wireless room and a bomb room. From
the keel further aft were three gondolas which were suspended
below and accessible by open ladders. The ship gondolas also contained
airtight buoyancy bags in case the ships had to alight on water.
This was a technical requirement of all ships since HMA 1 - the
Mayfly. With this rapid expansion of the requirement for airship
production, there were a few problems in that so far, only one
company had actually built a ship and hence had all the facilities.
However to help the programme Vickers provided components to the
other three companies to assist in production. The original ships
were divided out between the various contractors and the registrations
were allocated between them:-
In April 1916 the Government approved for a total fleet of 10,
23 class ships, but this was later modified in the light of further
design technology available from Germany. The later ships becoming
the R23X class and the R31 class.
The
HMA 23 was the first to be completed, and hence the designation
of the class of ships. There were a number of delays in the initial
constructions and the ship was completed on 26th August 1917.
This led to the order of the R26 as Vickers had the space available
to build the ship. On lift and trim trials, the HMA 23 was found
to have a disposable lift of only 5.7 tons due to the machinery
being two tons heavier than originally estimated. Five weeks later
the HMA 25 was completed and her tests gave almost identical results.
Although not unexpected, the figures were disappointing and 2
weeks later on the 18th October the Admiralty decided that the
design must be altered. On the day of the decision the HMA 24
was also tested and found to be mysteriously two thirds of a ton
heavier than her sister ships, with a lift of only 5.1 tons. The
alterations to the ships included the removal of dynamos and bomb
frames and many other items which were deemed not necessary were
removed. Upon inspection of No. 24 it was later found that the
ship was heavier due to having used rivets, fastenings and bracing
pieces which were slightly larger and heavier than originally
expected and hence increased the overall weight of the ship.
The
Admiralty ordered that modifications be carried out at once to
R.26, which was still in the early stages of construction, while
the other three ships were to be modified similarly but, of necessity,
over a longer period and slightly less drastically. The measures
to be undertaken were aimed at lightening the airships by the
elimination of all unnecessary weight. In addition to removal
of the dynamos, buffer wheels and bomb frames, many other small
items not considered essential were either taken out or replaced
with lighter equipment. The folding tables which had been intended
for the keel cabin were never installed and the original plan
of fitting a two-pounder gun on the top platform was also discarded.
The rear car was replaced by a smaller and lighter one containing
an engine with direct drive to a single two-bladed propeller 13
feet 6 inches in diameter. As there was now no space for the auxiliary
controls, these were transferred to the keel cabin.
Some
of these modifications had already been carried out on the first
three ships, while others followed in due course. Together they
effected a marked, if not substantial, improvement to the airships'
performance. No 24 required more than minor modifications, since
she was so much heavier than the other ships. As Beardmore's shed
was needed immediately for the building of R.34, it was necessary
to move the ship to her new station at East Fortune as soon as
possible. This required extra lift to enable her to fly safely
over the hilly countryside of southern Scotland, so in addition
to the changes already made, the drastic step was taken of removing
all the machinery from the aft car: engine, propeller, radiator
and silencers. All these modifications brought the disposable
lift up to nearly 6.5 tons, but the price paid was a top speed
barely in excess of 35 mph. In this form No 24 was delivered in
October 1917. No 25 was delivered in the same month, but R.26,
on which Vickers could not begin work until No 9 had left Barrow,
arrived much later. All the recommended modifications were incorporated
in the course of her construction. Although built more quickly
than the others, in only about a year, she did not fly until March
1918.
HMA
No 23
All four of the 23 class airships were flown extensively, but
although rather more efficient than No. 9 they still did not provide
the performance which had been hoped for. No 23 herself had been
commissioned on 15th October 1917, and left on that day for Pulham.
She had a top speed of 52 mph and flew a total of 8,426 miles
in 321 hours and 30 minutes. Although she carried out some patrols,
usually under the command of Captain I. C. Little, she was used
mainly for training and experimental work. Trials were undertaken
in January 1918, at Pulham with a two-pounder gun in its mounting
on the top platform of No 23. The gas valves were placed on either
side of the hull rather than at the top to, avoid risk of escaping
gas being ignited during firing.
Six
shells were fired with the gun pointing downwards, but instead
of embedding themselves in the mud of the airfield as expected,
they seem to have ricochet into the surrounding countryside. The
airship took the strain well, although some flexibility was present
which would have adversely affected aiming under combat conditions.
No further action was taken in the matter because of the ever
present weight problem. Later in 1918, No 23 was involved in another
experiment, this time to determine whether an aeroplane could
be carried by an airship and released in mid-air either to repel
attackers or to take offensive action on its own account. A Sopwith
Camel was suspended beneath the envelope by specially prepared
slings. For the first trial, a dummy was placed in the cockpit
and the controls were locked. As the airship flew over Pulham
air station the aeroplane was released. It glided to the ground,
showing that the slipping gear operated correctly. Another Camel
was then taken up, this time piloted by Lieutenant E. Keys. As
the aeroplane left No 23 the pilot had no trouble in starting
the engine. He pulled out of the dive to fly around the airship
before landing safely.
No
provision had been made for retrieval of the aeroplane during
flight, as the intention was that it should make its own return
to base after action. As with other unusual projects tried out
during the war, nothing further was attempted. Similar trials
were held after the war with R.33, and the method was eventually
perfected by the Americans in the early 1930s. A noteworthy departure
from routine training and testing befell No 23 on 6th December
1917, when she was sent to make an unannounced daylight flight
over London, arriving out of the mist from Pulham around midday.
At a low altitude she circled over Buckingham Palace, Whitehall
and the City, where thousands of Londoners clearly saw the lights
twinkling in her gondolas; the red, white and blue roundels on
her envelope and her designation numerals. Wartime censorship
allowed press reports of the incident ("At last. ..a British
Zeppelin"), but the airship's number could not be published,
despite its having been so publicly displayed! Twice in the following
year No 23 flew again over London, on one occasion accompanied
by R.26, but these appear to have been the high points in an otherwise
mundane and unwarlike career. She was deleted in September 1919.
HMA
No 24
Her
sister ship No 24 had a similar history, flying a total of 164
hours and 40 minutes and covering 4,200 miles, but as the original
intention of replacing her missing engine in a new and lighter
car was never carried out, she remained very slow.
On
one typical occasion, encountering an unexpectedly strong adverse
wind near the Bass Rock, she remained for some time stationary,
quite unable to make any headway. Despite this severe handicap
she was used for training and convoy duties
when conditions were deemed suitable, although she appears to
have seen no action. She made her last wartime flight in June
1918, but was retained in service and two months later had her
bows strengthened to adapt her for mooring trials at Pulham, where
Vickers were building a new type of high mast.
The
tests, which were carried out with both midship engines removed,
were quite successful but were not completed finally until November
1919. The following month No 24 was deleted and scrapped.
HMA
No 25
No 25 had been assembled slightly differently from the other three
ships and always suffered from gasbag surging, which caused instability
by moving the centre of lift unpredictably. In spite of this she
flew 221 hours and 5 minutes in service, covering 5,909 miles.
Stationed for most of her career at Cranwell, she was used mainly
for training before being deleted in September 1919.
HMA R 26
The last of the class was R.26. (The Admiralty decided on 18th
December 1917, that all future rigid airships should have the
prefix R before their number.) Apparently the only one of her
class to incorporate all the design changes, she was commissioned
on 22nd April 1918, and stationed at Howden. During tests she
was found to have a disposable lift of 6 1/4 tons, a top speed
of 54 mph and a ceiling of 3,500 feet. It was also discovered
that if the engines were stopped at 53 mph the speed fell to 18
mph in two minutes, so great was the drag. By the end of the year
she had flown 191 hours and 29 minutes, of which the highlights
were a flight with No 23 over London on 25th October and a patrol
of 40 hours 40 minutes on 4th/5th June, when she was commanded
by Major T . This was the longest flight yet by a British rigid,
beating No 23's previous record, set up a few days earlier, by
32 minutes. Later in the year she was transferred to Pulham and,
commanded by Major Watt, she supervised the surrender of German
submarines at Harwich on 20th November 1918. In January 1919,
R.26 flew a further 6 hours 18 minutes, and then had her bows
specially strengthened before being experimentally moored out
in the open, using the "three wire system". She had
a tendency to assume a tail up attitude, But this was overcome
by fastening sandbags to the after guys, and she survived for
over a week without harm. Then the weather worsened, rain soaked
her envelope and a snowstorm finally beat her into the ground.
Her cars were removed, allowing her to float again, but it was
soon found that the damage she had sustained was too severe for
repairs to be worthwhile. On 24th February the order was given
for her to be scrapped and her official deletion followed on 10th
March.
THE
BUILDING SCHEDULE OF HIS MAJESTY'S AIRSHIP No.23
1916
Jan.
1.
Whole
of duralumin for parallel portion ordered. General design
of ship still under consideration by the Admiralty
Jan.
8
Total
number of hands on Vicker's book, 86.
Jan.15.
Fabric
not yet ordered.
Jan.29.
12,000
bracing pieces ready. Large quantity of angle and channel
in store.
Feb.
19.
Erection
of girders commenced.
Mar.
4.
All
duralumin for hull ordered, also diagonal wires for parallel
part. Rapid progress being made in assembling girders.
Mar.
18.
Erection
of cradles in Walney shed commenced. 200 ft. lengths of girder
completed and passed.
Mar.25.
Girders
being assembled at rate of 100 lengths per week.
Apr.
1.
300
ft. lengths of girder examined and passed.
Apr.
8.
Difficulty
experienced with main joint pressings.
Apr.
22.
Stiffening
of 8-way junction pieces settled.
Apr.
29.
50
per cent of girders completed.
May
6.
Cradles
ready for erection of bow portion.
May
27.
Erection
of frame section 1-2 commenced. Awaiting wires and fittings
from Messrs. Bruntons.
June
3
Over 1,000 girder lengths passed.
June
10
Erection
delayed by non-delivery of wires and fittings from Messrs.
Bruntons.,
June
17.
Girders
and joints for first six complete frames ready. Erection still
delayed as above.
June
24.
First
section (1-2) almost complete in tower.
July
1.
First
section (1-2) almost complete in tower.
July
8.
Section
1-2 complete. Construction of substructure of forward and
after cars commenced. Overseers state expected date of completion
August 21, 1916
July
15.
50
per cent of fabric for gasbags and outer cover being proofed.
July
22.
Frame
section 3-4 complete. Engines allocated.
July
29.
Frame
section 5-6 complete. All duralumin tubes for keel complete.
Transmission gear being manufactured by Messrs. Wolseley.
Aug.
5.
Frame section 7-8 complete. Sections 3-4 and 4-5 being joined
up. Gasbags, fabric work 50 per cent complete
Aug.
12.
Frame
section 9-10 complete. Vickers' date for completion, November
18, 1916. Delay attributed to machinery .
Aug.
19
Frame
section 11-12 complete. Men taken off NO.23 to hasten completion
of No.9.
Aug.
26
First delivery of net cord. No work on erection of NO.23 at
Walney.
Sept.
9
Erection
of NO.23 resumed at Walney. Keel, gondolas, fins, rudders
and elevators, nets, gasbags and outer cover-work proceeding.
Sept.
16
Frame
Section 13-14 complete. 4° sections of nets completed.
Sept.
23
Frame
section 15-16 complete. Gasbags : fabric work complete. Other
work 25 per cent complete
Work's
holiday. No erection at Walney. Girder fabric covering strips
25 per cent finished.
Oct.
7.
Framework
girders complete.
Oct.
14.
Four
sections of framework joined up. Gas valves: first spinnings
received.
Parallel
portion of hull framework (3-10) complete. Outer cover sections
II and 12 forwarded to Barrow for test. Wolseley's state first
set of machinery will be ready by middle of December, 1916.
Nov.
II.
No
erection on NO.23 at Walney. Men employed on No.9. Outer cover
section tested on framework. Set of spinnings for automatic
gas-valves received.
NOV.25
Framework
section 17-18 complete. Bow end and tail end being erected.
Work on No.9 delaying erection of NO.23. Assembling of keel
transverse frames commenced. Girder covering strips complete.
Vickers' date of completion now February I, 1917.
Dec.
2
All wires and fittings for main framework in Vickers' hands.
Dec.
9
Nets
being placed in ship. First engine carried out trial at makers'
works. Propellers received. Frame sections 3-15 joined up
complete with wiring.
Dec.
16
12 petrol tanks completed.
Dec.
23.
Hull
practically complete. Keel well forward. Cars progressing
satisfactorily. Preparations being made for slinging hull.
1917
Jan.
6
One automatic gas-valve assembled complete.
Jan.
13
Gasbag
test carried out in ship January 9, 1917. One transverse frame
buckled. Three keel covers complete. Additional stiffening
to frame 3 in way of gun platform being fitted. Details of
engine seatings in cars being replaced.
Jan.
20
Delay
to keel being caused by non-delivery of steel tubes from Messrs.
Tubes, Ltd.
Jan.27
Gasbag
test on January 25, 1917. Steel tubes for keel delivered.
Electrical installation unsettled.
Feb.
10
Hull
framework completed and passed byoverseers. Keel being re-shuffled
on account of heavier gun platform to carry 2-pounder gun
being required. Gasbags to be enlarged as result of gasbag
test.
Feb.
17
Hull
framework lifted on February 14th. Complete set of machinery
expected by end of March. Vickers' date for completion now
end of April, 1917.
Feb. 24. Attachment to keel to ship commenced. One engine
in position in forward car . Fins completed ready for fabric
covering. Full set of petrol tanks received. Full set of propellers
received. Controls commenced.
Mar.
3
90
foot of keel erected on ship. Rudders and elevators complete
ready for fabric covering. Gasbags being enlarged. Steel tubes
for keel still required. All details making progress. Date
of completion postponed to second week in May on account of
non-delivery of steel tubes.
Mar.
17.
Keel
delayed by non-delivery of steel tubes. After car engine in
place. Forward car ready to go to Walney.
Mar.24.
Engineers
went on strike March 21, 1917. Bags Nos. I, 2, 3, 10, II,
12, 14, 16, 17, and 18 completed and despatched from Douglas.
Mar.31.
Work
at a standstill owing to engineers' strike. Apr. 7. Work at
a standstill owing to engineers' strike. Vickers' date for
completion now first week in June, 1917.
Apr.
14.
Work
resumed. 50 keel frames erected on ship. Horizontal and upper
fIns: covers fitted. Rudder and elevator planes: covers fitted.
Steel tubes now all received.
Apr.28.
Overseers'
report progress unsatisfactory owing to difficulty in obtaining
satisfactory castings and forgings for rudder and elevator
control gear. Date now postponed to second week in June.
May
5.
After
car transferred to Walney, May 2nd.
May
12
All
keel frames erected in position. Midships car transferred
to Walney, May Ilth.
May
19
End
fittings to steel keel tubes found to require modification.
First top gas-valve completed. Engines fitted up in midships
car .
May
26.
Engineers'
strike, May 19th-May 24th
June
9.
Modifications
to keel complete. Keel being tuned up. Details proceeding
satisfactorily. Date now given, June 30th.
June
16.
Installing
keel, walking-way, petrol and water ballast girders. 12 gasbags
in ship and partially inflated. 8 sections of outer cover
in position. Preliminary run of forward car machinery, June
10th.
June
23.
Overseers
dissatisfied with progress. Controls behind-hand. Date postponed
to July 14, 1917.
June
30.
Ball bearing for control pulleys not delivered. All bags in
ship.' All outer cover sections in place. Petrol tanks being
fitted.
July
7
Petrol
service being fitted, also water and lubricating services.
Controls and telegraphs being fitted.
July
14.
Additional
stiffening being fitted to stern of ship. (Addi- tional cruciform
girder at Frame 19.)
July
21.
Ship
lifted by gas in bags on June 20th, ready for cars to be suspended
underneath. All bags inflated to 65 per cent. Outer cover
sheets laced down to E girder.
July
28.
Controls
and electrical installation well in hand. Preliminary machinery
test in aft car July 29th.
Aug.
3.
Airborne
shed machinery trial, July 31, 1917, Works closed August 3
to 13, 1917, for holiday. Date given for flight trials, August
19, 1917.
Aug. 18.
Loading
of elevators and horizontal fins carried out on I 7th, 18th,
and 19th. Aug. 25. Rudder, elevator, ballast, and gas-valve
controls giving trouble
Aug.
26.
LIFT
AND TRIM TEST.
Sept.
I.
Testing
of gas-valves complete, August 28th. Testing of petrol system
complete, August 28th. Gas-valve, water ballast, and trail
rope release controls completed, August 29th. Engine-room
telegraphs, August 3lst.
Sept.
8
Ship
ready for flight trials, September 3, 1917. Failure of midship
propeller bracket supports on September 4th.
Sept.
15
New
bracket supports fitted. Ship ready for flight.